|
|
-
|
I think that it is very easy to simply state that one believes in God.
Too simple is it to blindly follow words written in a book or spoken by a man who claims to be "holy." Just because it has been around for centuries does not mean that religion has any factual significance to Earth, space, time, miracles, divine rite, faith, etc... One can only attempt to completely understand the intricacies of faith and religion and thereby come to a quasi-conclusive question: Why? Why do I believe in that which I cannot see? Why to I have faith that God is watching over me? Why do miracles happen? In order to answer the question of "why?" one must take the responsibility upon themselves to rationally and ethically determine the answer on one's own.
Days, weeks, or years spent reading and compiling information from all aspects and opinions followed by hours of self-contemplation and meditation is the only way to achieve a correct reply to the question. "Correct" in the sense that their cannot be one correct answer to every quandary. And that is why religion is a tough case to crack.
Even when one comes to an absolute conclusion to the questions that lead them to believe or disbelieve in their God or their faith, it is the human condition to then determine HOW the events that the faithful so undoubted determine to be of holy or divine nature actually occur; How do miracles occur? How does God watch over everyone in the world [or universe]? How can so many religions exist if there is only one God? How can there be so many questions?
It is my belief that after years of reading, writing, and through self interpretation or WHY and HOW, regardless of sexual orientation, socioeconomic status, age, gender, or intelligence quotient, that the absolute end-all be-all of religion is that there is no possibility that there has been or ever will be an existence of an omnipresent being such as God.
And so, I want to leave you all, believers and nonbelievers alike, with one last thought: Ask yourself WHY and HOW and determine your own answers, but do not be too quick to shut out the possibility of other answers and do not stop asking until you are one-hundred percent positive that your answers are accurate. If one is not at least willing to listen and understand different opinions and view-points, then one is truly lost.
|
-
Everyone has heard about the controversy pertaining to the struggle of passing the Olympic Torch through Europe; Paris and London in particular. The protesters are constantly attempting to extinguish the flame by any means, and if this cannot be accomplished they are still putting as much effort as possible into making the touch extremely difficult to take along its course. They have a good cause to protest; however, it does seem like the Olympics is not the time. Am I wrong? Protest such as these have occurred several times in the past and I cannot condone the actions of the men and women that practice such violence in a time that, by decades of tradition, is meant to be a time of peace among nations! The people protest the human rights violations that the Chinese practice on their citizens. It is absolutely unreasonable for them to act like its not a problem. I watched the video about the protests and the torch-run and the correspondent in China reported that the Chinese media is taking a completely different stand by saying that they are more upset about the people protesting and disturbing the course of the touch. This is the view that I must agree with. I realize the China is using this as a stage to portray that they are an economical power in the world, which is kind of under-handed, but the fact that it IS the Olympics undermines everything that the Olympics stands for. Ever since the beginning of the games it has been tradition for all countries involved to be at peace. And for the Tibetans and the English to completely ignore this tradition and respect for the games is, in my mind, especially unnecessary.
|
-
http://www.slate.com/id/2183121/ I like the poem a lot! The imagery and attention to to detail remind me of when I had to write my memoir in composition 1. I really felt like I could see the room that Michael Chitwood speaking about. This is an especially good poem to read while listening to a slow classical song. While listening to the music, read a couple lines and then close your eyes and try to imagine it in your head. I felt like I was there. I could see the the emptiness and I could sense the "dearly departed" walking about the room. It is almost as though Michael is writing as if he were in limbo. Another way to read it would be to say that he is the one that has passed away and he is lingering in purgatory. The fact that he uses such vivid imagery makes this poem work successfully. The only thing that didn't make much sense to me was the rhythm. At some points it doesn't really feel like it flows correctly. I think that it might be better for Chitwood to wrap the lines together differently, perhaps instead of having five stanzas it would be better suited to have two. That is just how I feel, If any one has any suggestions that you think would give the poem better rhythm. Overall, I think its a great poem. And, With a little bit of work it could be even better. Any comments are welcome. Thank you.
|
-
Today started out as an amazing day that my friends and I decided to use as a beach day. They woke me up at 12 o'clock, still hung over, and told me to get my suit and head down stairs. The trip to Clearwater beach was long, but it was worth it; or so I thought. The beach was nice. The guys and I played football while the girls bathed in the sun. After our game we decided that it would be fun to swim out as far as we could. My friend Sean almost got run over by a wave-runner and we immediately decided that it was time to go back ashore. We snacked on Doritos and smoked hookah while observing all of the attractive females that had also decided to make and appearance at the waterfront. As the hours were winding down, we eventually made the decision to leave, and as I was getting up, I pulled the blanket and the coal from our hookah fell all over my arms. So not only was I sun burned from being at the beach with no shirt on for hours, but I also had burns on my arms from the coal. We eventually made our way back to the cars when suddenly my close friend James decides that him and his girl friend aren't going back to campus just yet. They are going out to dinner. leaving the five of us with a four-seater convertible without seat belts in the backseat. We almost got pulled over twice on the way home. These... are the Days of Our Lives...
|
-
How I got Iraq Wrong - Jacob Weisberg - http://www.slate.com/id/2187105/ I think that Jacob Weisberg is completely correct about everything he mentions in his article. We have to finally accept that we screwed up in Iraq and move on. By lingering on the past we are never going to make the situation better than it is now. It also would have beneficial, as Weisberg points out, to have considered the country's past history before we went there. We made a fairly sudden decision to go to Iraq and begin what could be classified as a revolution. The only way to get Iraq back on its feet, at this point, is to give the country some sort of 5 year plan that they can manage themselves and leave them be. They are going to continue to kill innocent soldiers that should not even be in Iraq in the fist place. If they cannot run the country by themselves at this point in the "revolution" then maybe they don't deserve to have one? They have an army that is completely capable of controling their own country and should be utilized.
|
-
"When did American Idol get so emotionally violent?": http://www.slate.com/id/2182340 Personally, I have no bout with anything or anyone affiliated with American Idol. And being that I am neutral in this matter I feel that I can give an honest and constructive opinion. I say that those staff members of the Slate organization whom were involved in the online conversation are completely overreacting. To say that those who are responsible for the things that air on the program are purposefully picking on the "freakish" or "strange" aspects of the participants in the screening process is to say that the entire series is terrible. I can agree that a few things that they focus on are a bit harsh; however, the fact is that this is the trademark "folly," as it were, of "reality television." "Reality television" was created to show what actually occurs in people's lives. Yes, some so-called "reality television" programming is scripted, but this is not to say that real events don't occur. The point is that if one was to scrutinize American Idol for the ridiculous and seemingly cruel things portrayed of these contestants then one should also be attacking all of "reality television." To pick on one show just because it is a supposed "family" program is unfair because all of these shows are available to any view. It is the point of "reality television" to pick-out its character's weaknesses and exploit them. This is the format that the audience has come to expect and enjoys. Without this type of "bullying," as is could be called, "reality television" would have no viewers and cease to exist. So to those who a participated in the Slate conversation, I say, "If you are going to argue the faults in 'reality television' programming your time would be much better spent on trying to persuade readers to dislike it rather than belittle a show and its employees for doing there job by giving their audience what it wants. Because that makes you 'the bad-guy.'" Schadenfreude -
Pleasure derived from the misfortunes of others.
|
-
... is an article written by Jack Shafer. It describes the article of the New York Times that is based off a press release from the "drug czar" John Walters. Both seem to present the same argument, saying that there is a sudden increase in the amount of ecstasy tablets, especially those containing methamphetamine. Shafer has broken these cases down to point out that most of their facts do not hold water and that the government is trying to make citizens feel afraid of a would-be ecstasy epidemic with terrible results. The author of the article in the Times should never have used a press release as a primary source for an article. We expect such articles to be well researched and credible, but if it is written solely from a press release that is simply lazy and misleading. The problem with all of this is that the information conveyed in the "drug czar's" press release was inaccurate and unreliable. Is this the kind of reporting that we can expect from our government? Author Jack Shafer specifically uses the term "scaremongering" because it is a powerful and emotional word that drives home his point of scrutiny against both the article and the press release. If the government is stooping to what could be called an act of terrorism, then why do we have any trust in our government to protect us for real threats? Scare tactics are not a particularly intelligent way of approaching anti-drug awareness...
|
-
I can honestly say that, of all of the people that influence my life from day to day, the person who has given me the most significant experience of my life is my brother. Six years ago, during my brother's senior year of college at the University of Florida, my dad and I went Gainesville to see a football game. Before the game we made a trip to my brother's fraternity house that has changed the course of my life. Everyone was there! I didn't know anything of his brothers, but what was more important is that he new every guy. And, they were all the best of friends. The house was a mess; it was safe to say that the house one could hear the house aging. But all the guys helped to keep the house running because it was a symbol of their brotherhood. It son became obvious to me that these guys were not desperate individuals looking to buy someone else's friendship, but they were more like a group of guys that care about what happens to each other and how their lives turn out. Leaping forward into the near-present, during my freshman year in college, I was considering rushing a fraternity but when it came time, I decided against it. However, through all of the friends I made that first semester, most of the guys I now are now in fraternities, which gave me some insight into which fraternity I might considering joining in the spring. After learning more about these fraternities, I came to the conclusion that none of them were right for me. I spoke with my brother about it on the phone and he asked me if there was a chapter of his fraternity on our campus. There isn't one, so he said, "Well, maybe you should start a chapter." I thought it was a joke and didn't think anything more of it until I discussed the thought with my roommate the next day. And after we made the choice to get this fraternity going, I can say with deep sincerity, that this is the best decision I have ever made in my life! This isn't your typical fraternity. We don't party all the time an get drunk because there is so much more than that: networking, philanthropy, pride, and above all else academia. We are all here to learn. If my brothers' GPA begins to slip I will do everything in my power to help them get back on the right track. Without Theta Chi in my life, I would not have anything to be proud of, other than my exceptional ability to dominate every video game that I play. (lol) In all seriousness, I am so glad that I get to be a part of this completely new campus organization that gets to make a positive difference in young men's lives. Sigma Alpha Epsilon's slogan would lead the reader to believe that they are the "true gentlemen of USF." All I have to say is that USF hasn't seen anything yet!
|
-
After reading the article, "Mean Street Theater: An Awful Image for Black America" written by John McWhorter, I agree with McWhorter on his analysis of rap and its culture. The rap culture has turned from its origins as Hip Hop into a "Menace II Society." Hip Hop was originated as lyrical poetry that was put to head-bobbing beats to help accompany the rhyme and meter. All rap is, is "my ***, this" and "my hoes, that." It's all about cars and money and who can, in my honest opinion, invent the most simple and idiotic dance (the song for which explains how to do it). The violence has always been behind the scenes from the beginning, and as long as rap culture continues to be popular it will not diminish. This is where I stop agreeing with both John McWhorter and, author of "Hip-Hop Activism Buds Beautifully," Opio Sonkoni. Sokoni's article refutes McWhorter's. And even though I agree more with McWhorter, I feel like both authors have over looked one major thing in their arguments: Are they arguing against rap or hip hop? Theses are two completely different genres. Rap is a folly, and hip hop is an art-form. I cannot sympathize with either authors because it is clear to me that they have no idea what they are talking about in the first place. I may have more respect for an author who knows the difference and then complains about the negative messages and affects on the culture behind it.
|
-
I read Liz Addison's article, "Two Years Are Better Than One." As convincing the article may be, I find it hard to put myself in her shoes. I, and my parents, have been planning to go to a four-year university since birth; however, I did spend a summer at my local community college, Seminole Community College. Now, I can understand where Addison is coming from; for some people, community college literally is the first step into a successful life. But, in the town where I am from, the community college is seen as extension of High School and to most students it is a joke. Locals call it, Lake Mary University. Not because of the quality of education, rather because of the number of students from the surrounding high schools go there. Our graduating class consisted of over 650 students, about 300 of which when on to a university and of those left, about 250 went to SCC. I fell behind in my accumulation of credits so my parents though it would be good for me to go to community college to catch up while I was at home working for the summer. I can honestly say that it really is like going back to high school. The "professors" teach as if everyone in the class has a learning disorder. It's a mockery. So, if you are headed off to community college, good for you! Perhaps this is the little nudge you need to boost your self esteem high enough to get you on the track to leading a successful life; however, to all you high school students out there who think to yourselves, "I don't need to do well and go to a university. I will go to community college for two years and transfer to a university," this is not the way to go. Do as well as you can in high school because you will be better off in the long-run.
|
-
"Harrison Bergeron" is clearly written to represent the extremist point-of-view, yet it still makes me think of all the "crazies" in the world that think that equality of such a caliber is necessary. As hard as I try to believe that there could not possibly be someone so ignorant that they would have these ideas, I come to the realization that not everyone can think alike. Although, just for a second, put yourself into the world created by the "Handicapper General." When you compare/contract our modern society and that of the society the Bergeron's live in it brings about many questions: If everyone was equal, would we have the same concept of love? How many people can you think of are so much individualistic that if ordered to change by someone like the Handicapper General would rather choose death? Would our technology be the same? Does the government choose our jobs, our friends, our biology (specifically genetics)? Where does "equality" end and madness begin? I feel like every time I see an advertisement for different clothing companies and such that do not directly come out and say that buying their product makes the consumer "better" than those without, although it is implied, which on the one hand is terrible. Terrible in the sense that: the idea of simply wearing a certain style or brand on clothing makes one better than their fellow man; however, on the other hand this is the type of competition that leads to the individuality that makes our existence great! The relatively large increase in the existence of technology in the past 50 years especially would never have happened as rapidly without inequality bringing out the best in our ultra-competitive minds.
|
-
In a persuasive argument, the author uses ethos, pathos, and logos to sway the audience's point-of-view to match their own. Propaganda is meant to accomplish the same goal but by different means. The difference is that propaganda is basically when someone with power finds a weakness in a peoples' or culture's morals and exploits it to make that people see things from their own point-of-view. Let me elaborate... An "Idealist" such as Bin Laden uses his power to promote videos such as the one written about in the article, "Osama's Vision of the Future." And then he point out things such as problems with our capitalist economy (the weakness in our culture) to sway his audience to his perspective. This is not to say that Bin Laden is completely responsible for those who see his videos and convert to Islam, whether extremist or not. I think that with the way the US economy is right now, there are a lot of people out there who need that little "nudge" to push them to change their perspective. These people are already anxious for change and when someone like Bin Laden tells them that there are alternatives to the culture they know, they hop on the "wagon." We also have to remember that in Afghanistan, Bin Laden is not seen as much of an extremist as we see him in America. So while Bin Laden is strengthening his troop's morale in Afghanistan, he is recruiting from other countries by releasing these videos.
|
-
After reading the article entitled
“Action-Oriented Morality,” I felt like there is so much more that Israel and America
can do to assist the situation in Darfur. Israel and its people are used to dealing with
oppression, and should therefore sympathize with the people of Darfur, especially after an event as bad as the
Holocaust. I understand that Israel
may be in a state of isolationism such as the United States before World War II,
but after a group has been through something as terrible as the Holocaust,
don’t you think that it would make them more compassionate especially for a
group of people going through an event similar to the Holocaust. Those who
expect favors should not be surprised when a favor is asked back in return.
America is in a similar situation
not because we have been through an event as devastating as the holocaust, but
because we consider ourselves to be the “police of the world.” We are equally as responsible as Israel for not
taking action. I am surprised that the
majority of Americans have not stood up and called for action; however, we are
doing what we can for them on a small level.
Private organizations are banding together to bring aid to the region of
Darfur.
It is still not enough. The American people are plagued by a self serving
mentality. Our entire economy and government depends on individual Americans fighting
to better their individual positions and in turn advancing the progress of the
entire society. However a country with as much wealth and global influence as
the United States
has the responsibility to set the standard for the rest of the world. We were
once a beacon of hope taking in the tired, the poor, and the huddled masses
yearning to breath free. Now we consciously reject those in a time of dearest
need.
|
|
|
|