Welcome to USF Writing Community Server Sign in | Join | Help

It is an intersting thing to observe the changes technical writing has undergone in the field of Computer Science.

Today's texts like C programming for dummies and Java Unleashed are a far cry from their predecessors.  Find a copy of Algorithms in C if you doubt me.

An interesting observation here is that computer science is the field which has created the advances in digital media and word processing.  This mean that the improvments in writing in this field are actually do to improvements in the field.

Older texts are very lacking in images and examples.  Over time the presentation evolved to include many code exerpts and run-time analysis diagrams.  The material has been  presented in an increasingly hip, engaging way.

Let's face it, if you're reading about a computer language, you don't want to have to stuggle to comprehend the English you are reading while trying to learn said computer language.  I suspect the delilvery of Computer Science material improved mostly because of the self-protective instincts of those whose business it is to write about the topic.

I for one am grateful.  The dry and obtuse texts about FORTRAN from the 80's are gone, replaced by engaging, often humorous, documents today which facilitate the difficult task of learning computer science.

 

The creative commons website at http://creativecommons.org/ is a very user-friendly website. 

It adheres to the best of our usablity guidelines.  They present their information in clear, simple steps.  Navigation of the site is easy and clearly accessable at top and often sides of the screen.  Their introduction to licnesing processes is both engaging and informative. 

The website uses extensive video clips to make their points known, and to teach you the process of licensing your creative works of any genre. 

This site is a good example of how even a comoplex or esoteric topic can become usable if the basic usablity guidelines are followed.

I submit that the first step of creation is imagining a thing can be done. 

The wright brothers imagined they could make people fly.  They struggled with the technology until they made it possible.  Edison imagined light without soot or fire, and after a time created it.  Examples like these are rife through history.

What I suggest is that science fiction inspires scientific research. 

In the 1920's-1940's the hot topic in science fiction was space flight.  In the 1960's it became reality.  The children who grew up reading about space flight matured and created the technology.

In the 1950's the sci-fi craze was alien encounters, and robots.  While we have no well documented alien encounters, we do have such things as SETI (the Search for Extra Terrestrial Intelligence project) and the voyager probes.  Effort have been made to initiate contact with aliens, and though fruitless so far, the technogy required has been developed and is in use today to better all mankind. 

Robotics has become a respected science, with applications in business, research, military, security, and many other aspects of life.  All becasue they were good to write about 50 years ago.  Toady we even have battle-bots for the layperson, with their own TV show.

Star Trek imagined supra-light speed travel, personal communicators, and teleportation.  Today the math is being persued to develop FTL (Faster-Than-Light) travel.  It's obviously not here yet, but it is being worked on.  As far as personal communicators, we all have mobile phones or blackberrys with capacities that far eclipse thoe envisioned by Gene Rodenberry in the orgial Star Trek series.  They may not be as sleek as the communicators from Star Trek: The Next Generation, but they're close.  If you think teleportation is an impossiblity, take 5 semesters of calculus, some string theory, and advance Quantum physics and see if you still think its impossible.  It's getting closer every day.

What does that mean for our future?  Well, today's scinece fiction still holds all the old fascinations as the past.  It has its own crazes, though.  If you can truly predict technology through sci-fi, here's what I think we can see coming;

  • FTL communication
  • Nanotechnology as medical tool and weapons
  • Genetic manipulation for tailor-made bodies
  • The defeat of death due to age or sickness
  • Awakening of psionic powers in humans

If some of these toppics you have already heard of, don't be too suprised.  They're already in the research phase:-)

The current war in the mideast has not been a suprise.

We all knew it was coming for a long time.  You have Israel adjacent to nations who either shelter terror groups dedicated to the destruction of Israel(Syria, Lebanon) and nations who's constitution makes the eradication of Israel on of their national agendas (Palestine). 

Now a bit of recent background...

Over the last 6 years Israel has met or exceeded all UN brokered peace talks, including the requrement that all Israeli troops be pulled back to within the borders of Israel.  So they did.  They abandoned all ground presence in Lebanon and Palestine...their most frequent aggressors.  Another part of these UN resolutions required a cessation of hostilities from Lebanon and Palestine, the disbanding of Hezbula and that Syria and Iran (the country that FOUNDED Hezbula) must stop funding and training terrorists.

We can see how well that worked.  Hezbula took the opportunity this UN cease-fire created for them to recruit and train new members.  Hezbula also stockpiled weapons and rockets throughout Lebanon.  Remember, Hezbula was supposed to disband when Israel withdrew, remember?  Iran funneled weapons and money to the Hezbula for a future confrontation.

Last year Yassar Arafat died, but his political party became the majority party in Palestine.  Not a comfortable situation when a publicly declared terror organization is elected to head a county.

There was a popular revolution in Lebanon, and the people rose up as we had always hoped and installed a democratically elected government.  Good for them.  Unfortunately, the military of the legitimate Lebanese govenrment is small, and unable to controll or contain Hezbula.  Also, Hezbula is cunning enough to have spent some of its Iranian money on good works and cheritable actions, especially in southern Lebanon.  This has garnered them tremendous support from the locals, especially in the face of the weak and disorganized central government, essentially giving Lebanon two governments, elected and Hezbula.  In recent days the Lebanese prime minster has declared the government's support of Hezbula, even as they launch hundreds of missiles a day into Israel.

With the U.S. having removed Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq, the region was lacking a 'big boy'.  No one was standing up to percieved western tyrany.  Enter Iran, with a recently disclosed uranium enrichment program, now drawing immense international censure.  As a UN imposed deadline for cessation of uranium enrichment approached, the leadership of Iran encouraged Hezbula to become more active.  The hope was that trouble elsewhere would draw world attention away from Iran quietly trying to become a nuclear power.  It even worked to some degree.

About the Current Violence...

The day before the UN deadline for Iran came, Hezbula fighters penetrated Israel and ambushed a group of troops.  They killed 8 and captured 2 Isreili soldiers.  Rocket attacks against Isreili civilian centers began.

Israel's reaction was predictable, even if it was on a smaller scale than they usually operate.  Israel invaded Lebanon and began a massive air campaign to cripple the supply of weapon and missiles to Hezbula.  Isreili ground troops have been raiding into Lebanon and holding what ground they have to to prosecute the war against Hezbula on Lebanese soil.  Hezula has aquired Iranian made mid-range missiles that can strike Isreili targets at a distance of  125-150 miles, allowing rocket attacks on targets traditionally far behind the Isreili lines, deep into Israel.

Inverted Morality...

It is rediculous that in the media you see the Hezbula fighters portrayed as noble defenders of their land.  They began this conflict by invading Israel and killing/capturing Isreili soldiers.

Hezbula hides among the population of Lebanon, keeping its weapons stockpiles in mosques and residential houses, yet Israel is criticized for attacking 'non-military' targets.  The truth is that any place sheltering Hezbula is a military target, since Hezbula is pursuing military action against Israel.

Over and over we see the images of devastation and death in Lebanon, designed to evoke sympathy for Hezbula and create anger towards Israel.  What we don't see is the images of the death and destruction the thousands of Hezbula rockets have caused in Israel.  Israel is not using its peoples' suffereing as a propagana tool, whereas Hezbula is.

Why is it that Israel is recieving such condemnation, when Hezbula is the aggressor.  Hezbula hides among civilians.  Hezbula initiated hostilities.  Hezbula's greatest mistake to me was picking on a target that could defeat them.  I hope they do.  I hope Hezbula is eradicated by the Isrelis.  I have no sympaty for organizations who use terror as a tactic, and I have no condemnation for a nation that acts to protect is citizens.

Do you?

 

Students today seem to have it made. 

Really, at no other time have laypeople had access to the information we do.  We all walk around with gigabyte thumbdrives in our pockets, toting laptop computers while we listen to a podcast on our iPod, or yack it up on our bluetooth enabled wireless headset. 

You would think there was nothing for us to worry about regarding school.  I mean, how could there be...all we need to do to get information is ASK, and the internet provides.  Need to contact somone?  411 for anyone! 

Unfortuantely, many instructors see only the benefits of the techno-rich envioronment we are living in.  They do not always see the price we pay for it.  I don't mean the dollar amount (though that is significant) but the cost to us as people:

We may be networked to the entire world from wherever we may happen to be, but how do we combat that information overload.  With SO MUCH available we must be good judges of when information is likely to be valid, and when it is garbage.  We are forced to learn how to process this plethora of data efficiently.  Getting 2 million hits on a google search we have to write about is not particularly a good thing.  We have to sort the chaff from the gold.  In prior generations, undergraduate research was primarily a challenge in finding the information, if it is even possible to do so.  Now, there is likely  glut of information, but we must determine what is worth using...a project which involves MORE work and reading than it took to examine the 1 or 2 sources available to earlier students.

Our social skills often take a beating too.  We spend so much time interacting with electronic devices that our social graces become rusty.  You don't have to say please or thank you to your ipod.  Google does not make you convince it to give you the information you are asking for.  People require differernt handling than electronics, and I fear a genereation is coming that won't know that.  An instructor who comes from a pre-technorevolution time will have very little patience for the terse communication a techno-literate student may give them.  Not a good situation for the student who is being evaluated. 

We are becoming more and more physically isolated even as we are more electronically connected.  Imagine a 'group project' where the authors meet in person twice.  Believe me it is happening.  Probably has happened to you.  Now compare that to the 'good old days' when groups of students met regularly at the campus library to collaborate and help each other.  Our refined degree of convenience has cost us access to our fellow students as resources, and as simple human contacts.

How often are you alone in a room, just you and the glow of a computer screen?  Your 'human' contact and iPod or MP3 player?

Do we really have it made?

   Dan Mccarthy uses visual rhetoric to remind us of the cycle of life.  In his images, he repeatedly shows the echoing of the past through the present and the promise of the future. 

'3 of hearts' the ignorance of the long dead dinosaurs is echoed through the contemporary human skeletons, and again in the trees.  See it here http://www.danmccarthy.org/JPEGS/PRINTS/06.01.03.3ofhearts.jpg.  The dinosaurs were happy and unaware of their doom, as are we humans, even as we are dying and joining them.  The trees above all are happy and unaware of the doom of the animals beneath them.

'Photosynthesis' shows that even though the fauna of the world draws its life from the sun and rain, it is also fueled by us and all who came before.  Again Mccarthy uses the dinosaurs to represent the life that came before us.  We are the human skeleton, cheerfully joined with the dinosaurs in feeding the trees.  See it at http://www.danmccarthy.org/JPEGS/PRINTS/05.04.27photosynthesis.jpg.

'Second Chance' is a speculative piece.  It inspires you to ponder what would the world be like if the dinosaurs (i.e. life before humans) had a chance agiain, after man was gone and in the ground.  Dinosaurs huddling over a campfire denies Prometheus his sin, and inspires us to wonder what dinosaur technology would be.  See 'Second Chance' http://www.danmccarthy.org/JPEGS/PRINTS/04.12.17.secondchance.jpg.

The 'Untitiled' piece is perhaps the simplest of his works I have seen.  It is a blatant reminder that we are not alone in haunting the earth...and the trees STILL don't care what we do under them.  See it http://www.danmccarthy.org/JPEGS/PRINTS/04.09.16.jpg

'Taking' is a commentary on the nature of humanity.  We take and take and consider ourselves the lords of all we survey.  Seldom do we realize that in time we will be feasted upon by even the most tame, docile creatures of nature.  Have you ever feared the wrath of a bunny? (Monty Python not withstanding ;-))  See it http://www.danmccarthy.org/JPEGS/PRINTS/05.07.25.taking.jpg

'Sowing' is a powerful spread.  It emplores that proper husbandry of the land can free us of the doom we are trapped in (buried skeleton) and allow our spirit to admire and exist in peace with the land we have tended.  It is telling that this piece does not start with a tree in it...one of very few of Mccarthy's pieces to have that distinction.  See it http://www.danmccarthy.org/JPEGS/PRINTS/05.09.29.sowing.jpg

'Memories' is a humorous look at what we will all miss when we're gone.  Our bones will chat with the dinosaur's about what?  The trees and the sun.  See it http://www.danmccarthy.org/JPEGS/PRINTS/05.08.29.memories.jpg

Dan Mccarthy uses the images and symbolism to make us think about life and death.  He repeats themes with different creatures and skeletons to show time passing and how we are all interdependent.  The juxtaposition of current with past and enduring accentuates the fact that in the present we are generally aware of our place in time, and our role in the future.  McCarthy uses consistent symbolism throught his works to reiterate his theme of continuity.

I think his rhetoric is effective.  It is meaningful work that inspires thought from its viewers.  As with most good art, what each viewer sees and interprets is personal to them.  I look forward to reading my classmates' blogs on the material.

I never got any feedback on my Instrrucions assignment.

I also never saw anybody else's linked to in the blog.

I think we all missed a great opportunity to get a better grade, here...

Drat...

 

FINALLY got the family stuff locked down.

Wow do I have a bit of catching up to do.

Seems like I caught the deadline for the Instructions assignment, though...lucky!

Not being there Saturday hurt, though.

I know nothig of the group project, or even who my partener(s) are.

Lots of work to do...

The_Mighty_Quinn

Hey all,

I am having family trouble and will not be in class later today (Saturday).  When I have a chance, I'll upload my resume and cover letter, with links here and at my wiki page.

Sorry to not be available for peer review, I think I need it for this assignment.  I'll happily review anybody's work that they post in a blog or on their wiki page asking for a review.

Just a piece of personal advice...don't do crystal-meth, and don't let your family members do it either.  My brother's problem is now causing ME problems...hence the missed class.

Sorry all,

The_Mighty_Quinn

CamelCase   

CamelCase is an interesting spinoff to english.  It seems to be a dialect intruding into mainstream english from the hidden world of computer programming.  Anytime you see two or more words conjoined with captial letters in the middle of them, you are seeing CamelCase.  iPod, PlayStation, FedEx, etc are all examples of CamelCase.

Computer programmers have used CamelCase since the 1960's due to the constraints many programming languages attach to our naming conventions.  Most programming languages parse words by the space between them, as does natural English.  This means that naming a variable for instance:  'int number of iterations = 0;' simply does not work.  The compiler sees 'number', 'of', and 'iterations' as 3 separate names...to which it has no frame of refrence.  However, 'int NumberOfIterations = 0;' is a recognized by the compiler as a single variable of type integer you have initialized to 0.  As programmers continue to develop more and more complex programming languages, their computer language syntax will intrude more and more into conventional english.

Eventually, the forced practice of CamelCase spread to marketing and elsewhere.  Though not as initially invasive as the glut of e- and i- prefixes during the .com bubble, CamelCase seems to have more longevity.  Radio Shack becomes RadioShack, et al.

There are others who resist this trend.  Consider Microsoft, originally MicroSoft.  There are other examples.

Overall, I expect CamelCase to stay with us, and become even more prevelant as an increasing portion of the population becomes computer savvy.